|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
11/05/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
OLIVER, M.A.; NUTE, G.R.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; CAMPO, M.M.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAÑEQUE, V.; GUERRERO, L.; ALVAREZ, I.; DIAZ, M.T.; BRANSCHEID, W.; WICKE, M.; MONTOSSI, F. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA ANGELS OLIVER, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; GEOFFREY R. NUTE, Division of Farm Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom; M. FONT I FURNOLS, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; M. M. CAMPO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; CARLOS SAÑUDO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; VICENTE CAÑEQUE, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; LUIS GUERRERO ASOREY, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; INMACULADA ALVAREZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; MARÍA TERESA DÍAZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; WOLFGANG BRANSCHEID, Institut for Meat Production and Market Research, Kulmbach, Germany; MICHAEL WICKE, Forschungs- und Studienzentrum fur Veredelungswirtschaft der Universitat Gottingen, Vechta, Germany; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Meat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA)
from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. |
Contenido : |
The acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. MenosThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very accept... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; CONSUMERS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM. |
Thesagro : |
CARNE. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 03256naa a2200349 a 4500 001 1027449 005 2020-05-11 008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010$2DOI 100 1 $aOLIVER, M.A. 245 $aEating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2006 500 $aArticle history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA) from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. 520 $aThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK (n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. 650 $aCARNE 653 $aBEEF 653 $aCONSUMERS 653 $aOVERALL ACCEPTABILITY 653 $aPRODUCTION SYSTEM 700 1 $aNUTE, G.R. 700 1 $aFONT I FURNOLS, M. 700 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R. 700 1 $aCAMPO, M.M. 700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C. 700 1 $aCAÑEQUE, V. 700 1 $aGUERRERO, L. 700 1 $aALVAREZ, I. 700 1 $aDIAZ, M.T. 700 1 $aBRANSCHEID, W. 700 1 $aWICKE, M. 700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 773 $tMeat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
04/09/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
JAURENA, M.; DE BARBIERI, I.; MONTOSSI, F.; LEZAMA, F.; PEREZ GOMAR, E.; DIAZ, S.; SOSA, M.; CACERES, J.; ROVIRA, F.; ALBERNAZ, F.; SANCRISTOBAL, E.; LIMA, G. |
Afiliación : |
MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUIS IGNACIO DE BARBIERI ETCHEBERRY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FELIPE LEZAMA HUERTA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE PEREZ GOMAR CAPURRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SAULO SEBASTIAN DIAZ OLIVERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN IGNACIO CACERES OLIVERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO ROVIRA GALARRAGA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERONIMO LIMA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Evaluación de diferentes ofertas de forraje de campo natural sobre la producción y calidad de lanas finas y superfinas y en indicadores de sustentabilidad de suelos y de la comulnidad vegetal. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2008 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Día de campo, INIA Tacuarembó, Unidad Experimental Glencoe, Setiembre, 2008. Alternativas de intensificación, especialización, diversificación y valorización de la ganadería ovina y bovina en basalto. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2008. |
Páginas : |
p. 8-10 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
Objetivo: Cuantificar el efecto de diferentes niveles de asignación de forraje sobre características productivas y de indicadores de sustentabilidad de suelos y pastura natural así como la respuesta (producción y calidad) de lanas finas y superfinas. |
Thesagro : |
BASALTO; CAMPO NATURAL; GANADERIA; LANA; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4374/1/GLENCOE-2008SetGuia-de-actividad-Visita-guiada.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01366nam a2200313 a 4500 001 1021220 005 2018-09-04 008 2008 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aJAURENA, M. 245 $aEvaluación de diferentes ofertas de forraje de campo natural sobre la producción y calidad de lanas finas y superfinas y en indicadores de sustentabilidad de suelos y de la comulnidad vegetal. 260 $aDía de campo, INIA Tacuarembó, Unidad Experimental Glencoe, Setiembre, 2008. Alternativas de intensificación, especialización, diversificación y valorización de la ganadería ovina y bovina en basalto. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA$c2008 300 $ap. 8-10 520 $aObjetivo: Cuantificar el efecto de diferentes niveles de asignación de forraje sobre características productivas y de indicadores de sustentabilidad de suelos y pastura natural así como la respuesta (producción y calidad) de lanas finas y superfinas. 650 $aBASALTO 650 $aCAMPO NATURAL 650 $aGANADERIA 650 $aLANA 650 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aDE BARBIERI, I. 700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 700 1 $aLEZAMA, F. 700 1 $aPEREZ GOMAR, E. 700 1 $aDIAZ, S. 700 1 $aSOSA, M. 700 1 $aCACERES, J. 700 1 $aROVIRA, F. 700 1 $aALBERNAZ, F. 700 1 $aSANCRISTOBAL, E. 700 1 $aLIMA, G.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|